I am in the process of reading Alice Schroeder’s book entitled The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life. The book is a massive source of information about the life of Warren Buffett. Needless to say the book is unbelievable! I love to read about the life of people who, in my opinion, have lived a valuable and influential life.
At the beginning of the book Alice recounts an event from the Sun Valley Conference in Hailey, Idaho. Allen & Company, a boutique investment firm in Hollywood handles the event inviting such notables as Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, and Rupert Murdoch.
In 1999 Warren Buffett was asked to be the keynote speaker to end the conference. This was a special year because the conference was filled with Internet tycoons ready to embark on billion dollar ventures in the new year. They were invited and were making the most of rubbing shoulders with the richest individuals around the world.
The Internet tycoons walked into the conference room that day hoping for a glowing reception and the blessings from one of the greatest investors of our time. What they received was quite the opposite.
Warren Buffett practically dismantled the belief in the new Internet startup companies. He likens the Internet Boom to that of the airline industry:
“…So I submit to you: I really like to think that if I had been down there at Kitty Hawk, I would have been farsighted enough and public-spirited enough to have shot Orville down, I owed it to future capitalists.”
“It’s wonderful to promote new industries, because they are very promotable. It’s very hard to promote investment in a mundane product. It’s much easier to promote an esoteric product, even particularly one with loses, because there’s no quantitative guideline.”
Warren Buffett, pg 19.
Most of the venture capitalists and entrepreneurs left the meeting slightly chuckling at “old Warren’s mistake.” They found out later that he was exactly right.
Web 2.0 companies should listen to Warren Buffett. He has always cautioned the vamping of over-promoted companies and increasing investment in techonolgy companies with no substance.
“You can get in way more trouble with a good idea than a bad idea, because you forget that the good idea has limits.” -Warren Buffett, page 21
I have always been a skeptic of increasing investment in social media and web 2.0. I do love the sites and I love the fact that they are free. I have a problem with the valuation of multiple billions of dollars for the site like Facebook.
This is a dangerous game we are playing when it comes to the multitude of millions of dollars invested in Internet startups. I am afraid we never learned to begin with.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Buffett (but Were Afraid to Ask)
- Review: The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life by Alice Schroeder
- Like J.P. Morgan, Warren E. Buffett Braves a Crisis
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=20f90824-6152-446f-91a8-b95eff09e2a9)
Adam
This is just the social sites. Web 2.0 goes beyond just the word “social”. I remember it being closely related to the what might be (or should be) terms like “utility, usefulness, productivity,” etc. Google Maps was one of the first services that brought on the term web 2.0 along with the buzz word “AJAX”. This was due to the utility of the app and how it took something previously done by MapQuest and made it much easier to use and made you more productive because of it.
In the times of this creative economy, creating something for the sake of “coolness” doesn’t make it remarkable, useful, or successful. You would not build a “cool” house if it wasn’t structurally sound would you? The real question is, what do the VC’s who fund these sites see that leads them to believe they will see an ROI? Is it a roll of the dice with the hope that 1 out of 5 make it? What do you think?
Margaretta
Hey, that post leaves me feeling fooilsh. Kudos to you!